World News

Reasons for lifting New Zealand’s ‘historic’ smoking ban

Many companies would have suffered financial losses as a result of the prohibition, which would have resulted in a sharp decline in the number of stores offering cigarettes.

Unexpectedly, New Zealand, which just a year ago enacted the first generational smoking ban in history, is suddenly removing the ground-breaking policy. Driven by short-term budget needs and political considerations, the move has generated controversy and raised questions about the long-term effects on public health, especially for the Maori group, which has a disproportionately high smoking rate.

The former government of New Zealand progressively raised the legal age in an effort to end smoking. People who were born after 2008 would not have been able to legally purchase cigarettes. The creative proposal had attracted interest from all across the world and had even sparked a UK version. Early findings were encouraging: in the previous 12 months, almost 84,000 individuals gave up smoking.


However, this historic ban was lifted as a result of the recent change in administration, which was spearheaded by the New Zealand National Party. The ruling party, which was having difficulty forming a coalition government, gave in to pressure from its allies, the A-C-T New Zealand Party and New Zealand First, who demanded that the smoking prohibition be lifted in order to receive their support.

The loss of government revenue

Economic factors were taken into account in addition to political ones when deciding to lift the smoking prohibition. As part of its economic plan, the newly formed administration, headed by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, proposed tax reductions. They focused on the smoking ban, whose execution required significant financial resources, in an attempt to make up for the loss of government revenue. Many companies would have suffered financial losses as a result of the prohibition, which would have resulted in a sharp decline in the number of stores offering cigarettes. By lifting the prohibition, the government may continue to profit from the sales of cigarettes and keep the money that would have been used for subsidies.


Prime Minister Luxon declared, “Our government will rebuild the economy to ease the cost of living and to deliver tax relief and to increase the prosperity of all New Zealanders.” 

The short-term financial benefits of lifting the smoking prohibition are outweighed by the long-term advantages it offered. Over the following 20 years, the restriction was expected to save the New Zealand health system some $800 million. Furthermore, it addressed smoking as the nation’s greatest avoidable cause of death, with the goal of preventing an estimated 5,000 deaths yearly, as reported by Firstpost.


New Zealand’s decision to lift the generational smoking ban raises concerns about the prioritization of short-term advantages over long-term benefits in the conflict between political expediency and public health. The potential economic and health benefits of the smoking ban appear to have been compromised in favor of tax cuts, which means that the younger generation in New Zealand will have to suffer the repercussions of this policy reversal.

You might also be interested in – Smoking cannabis increases the risk of stroke, heart failure, and heart attack: Study

Dr. Shubhangi Jha

Avid reader, infrequent writer, evolving

Related Articles

Back to top button