Supreme Court Halts Krishna Janmabhoomi Survey; Further Hearing Scheduled

In a significant development, the Supreme Court, on Tuesday, issued an order to halt the Commissioner’s survey in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. This decision comes as a setback for the Hindu side involved in the case. The apex court took this step after considering a plea by the Shahi Idgah Committee, which contested the survey order. The Court found the request for the survey to be unclear and decided that further examination was necessary. A follow-up hearing on the matter has been scheduled for January 23 to delve deeper into the issues at hand.

Notice to Hindu Side and Challenge by Shahi Idgah Committee

As part of its directive, the Supreme Court also issued a notice to the Hindu side involved in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. This notice follows the plea presented by the Shahi Idgah Committee, which challenged the survey order. The Court’s decision to stay the survey and issue a notice underscores the complexity of the case and the need for a thorough examination of the various perspectives involved.

Court Deems Plea for Survey Vague and Requires Further Examination

The Supreme Court, in its evaluation of the plea for the survey in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute, found it to be vague. This led the Court to determine that additional examination and clarification were necessary before proceeding with any survey activities. This cautious approach reflects the court’s commitment to ensuring a fair and thorough assessment of the situation, taking into account the complexities and sensitivities surrounding the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute.

Further Hearing Scheduled for January 23

Recognizing the need for a comprehensive review of the case, the Supreme Court has scheduled a further hearing on January 23. This indicates the Court’s commitment to a diligent and impartial examination of the issues raised in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute. The additional time provided by the scheduling of the hearing allows for a more in-depth exploration of the arguments and evidence presented by the parties involved.

Supreme Court Emphasizes Responsibility in Transfer of Suits

In addition to the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute, the Supreme Court underscored its responsibility in deciding pleas challenging the transfer of suits from the Varanasi court to the Allahabad High Court. This aspect of the court’s directive highlights its broader role in overseeing legal proceedings related to the dispute. The transfer of suits between different courts adds another layer of complexity to the overall legal landscape, and the Supreme Court’s commitment to addressing such challenges is evident in its directive.

You might also be interested in Supreme Court strikes down Gujarat’s premature release of Bilkis Bano rape-murder convicts, calls for justice reinforcement